Disclaimer

We’re actively expanding Guideline Genius to cover the full UKMLA content map. Therefore, you may notice some conditions not uploaded yet, or articles that currently focus on diagnosis and management for now.

We are also continuously reviewing and updating existing content to ensure accuracy and alignment with current guidelines. Some earlier articles are undergoing revision as part of this process. Once all content has been fully reviewed, this will be clearly communicated on the platform.

For updates, follow us on Instagram @guidelinegenius.

We welcome any feedback or suggestions via the anonymous feedback box at the bottom of each article and will do our best to respond promptly.

Thank you for your support.
The Guideline Genius Team

Total Live Articles: 362

Assisted Vaginal Birth

RCOG Assisted Vaginal Birth (Green-top Guideline No. 26). Last reviewed: Apr 2020.

Definition

Assisted vaginal birth refers to the use of an instrument to facilitate vaginal delivery when spontaneous vaginal birth is not possible or safe.

Types and Classification

Instrument Types

Overview:

Instrument Description
Forceps A metal instrument is applied to the sides of the fetal head to provide traction and/or rotation

Subdivided into:
  • Non-rotational (e.g. Neville-Barnes, Wrigley’s) — used for outlet and low-cavity deliveries
  • Rotational (e.g. Kielland’s) — used for mid-cavity deliveries requiring rotation
Ventouse (vacuum extraction) A suction cup is applied to the fetal scalp, creating a vacuum to assist traction with maternal pushing

Available as soft cup or rigid cup devices

Classification by Station and Rotation

Classification Station Rotation required
Outlet Scalp visible, skull at perineum ≤45°
Low +2 cm, not yet at perineum Non-rotational (≤45°) / rotational (>45°)
Mid ≤1/5 palpable abdominally, station 0/+1 cm Non-rotational / rotational

Decision to Perform Assisted Vaginal Birth

Before performing an assisted vaginal birth, three questions must be answered

  1. Clinical indication present?
  2. ALL clinical requirements met?
  3. Forceps or ventouse?

1. Clinical Indications

Indication Additional notes
Fetal compromise This includes:
  • Pathological CTG
  • Thick meconium
  • Abnormal fetal blood sampling result (e.g. pH <7.2)
Lack of progress in 2nd stage labour* Lack of progress in nulliparous women:
  • >3 hours with regional analgesia
  • >2 hours without regional analgesia

Lack of progress in multiparous women:

  • >2 hours with regional analgesia
  • >1 hour without regional analgesia
Maternal exhaustion or distress The decision to intervene requires clinical judgment based on the maternal and fetal findings, the preferences of the woman, and the experience of the obstetrician
Medical indications to avoid the Valsalva manoeuvre (pushing) Specific medical indications include:
  • Cardiac disease
  • Hypertensive crisis
  • Cerebral vascular disease / malformation
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Spinal cord injury

*Lack of progress in 1st stage of labour is NOT an indication for assisted vaginal birth as it does NOT meet the requirement of ‘the cervix must be fully dilated’. In fact, assisted vaginal birth is strictly contraindicated before full cervical dilation.

2. Clinical Requirements

All 5 of the following requirements must be satisfied before proceeding with assisted vaginal birth:

Requirement Description
Fully dilated cervix (10 cm) + ruptured membranes

Assisted vaginal birth is strictly contraindicated before full dilatation of the cervix

Fetal head engagement* The fetal head must be ≤1/5 palpable per abdomen (in most cases, not palpable at all), and at the level of the ischial spines or below on vaginal examination
Fetal head position The exact position of the fetal head must have been determined
Caput and moulding must be no more than moderate Severe moulding indicates cephalopelvic disproportion and is a warning sign
Adequate maternal pelvis The maternal pelvis must be deemed clinically adequate

*Disclaimer: RCOG GTG 26 lists six requirements; fetal head engagement is presented here as a single criterion combining two separate guideline points (abdominal and vaginal assessment of head position) for clarity.

3. Choosing Forceps vs Ventouse

Assuming assisted vaginal birth is indicated AND meets the requirements

Scenario Recommendation
Prioritising maternal vs neonatal outcomes (general)
  • To reduce failure rate → forceps
  • To reduce maternal trauma → ventouse
Preterm gestation Forceps preferred over ventouse (due to premature infants’ susceptibility to cephalohaematoma, intracranial haemorrhage, subgaleal haemorrhage, and neonatal jaundice)

Exact recommendations:

  • <32 weeks of gestation: avoid ventouse
  • 32-36 weeks of gestation: ventouse should be used with caution, forceps are generally safer
Suspected fetal bleeding disorders Forceps preferred
  • Avoid ventouse
  • Fetal bleeding disorders are relative contraindications to assisted vaginal birth; experienced obstetricians should be involved in the decision-making
Malpresentation
  • Breech presentation (vaginal breech delivery) → forceps
  • Face presentation → forceps (ventouse is absolutely contraindicated)
Malposition (rotational births) Acceptable options include:
  • Kielland’s rotational forceps (less likely to fail and cause neonatal trauma)
  • Manual rotation followed by direct traction forceps or a vacuum
  • Rotational ventous extraction

Complications

Complications more likely with forceps Maternal:
  • Perineal and vaginal trauma (including anal sphincter injuries and perineal tear)
  • Need for episiotomy

Neonatal:

  • Facial nerve (CN VII) palsy – classic
  • Skull fractures
  • Fetal head impaction
  • Cervical spine injury (rare, specifically linked to the use of Kielland’s rotational forceps)
Complications more likely with ventouse General:
  • Instrument failure (forceps have a higher success rate)

Various neonatal bleeding complications:

  • Cephalohaematoma
  • Subgaleal haemorrhage
  • Retinal haemorrhage

Unsuccessful Assisted Vaginal Birth

Definition

Definition of unsuccessful assisted vaginal birth (ANY of the following):

Criterion Instrument
Birth not imminent after 3 pulls (maximum number of pulls) Both
Lack of progressive descent
Poor application (forceps cannot be applied easily or the handles do not approximate easily) Forceps
Failed rotation (during a rotational forceps birth, the baby’s head cannot be easily rotated with gentle pressure)
Multiple detachments (the vacuum cap detaches 2 times) Ventouse

Subsequent Action

Generally, a Caesarean section is the necessary next step

If the initial attempt was made with forceps and it failed, do NOT attempt ventouse afterwards.

If the inital attempt was made with ventouse and it failed, consider low-cavity forceps judiciously (the operator must carefully weigh this decision).

References

Share Your Feedback Below

UK medical guidelines made easy. From guidelines to genius in minutes!

Quick Links

Cookie Policy

Social Media

© 2026 GUIDELINE GENIUS LTD